Re: More Code Page wierdness
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.win32 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Magnus Hagander wrote: > I've never seen one that changes any chars <= 127. But it's possible the > editor in this case wrote down a file in the wrong charset. > Looking at http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/reference/wincp.mspx, "*" > is 002A in *every single one*, inlcuding japanese. > > Looking at http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/reference/oem/437.htm, it > shows that it's 002A in the very encoding Simon said was used in this > case. So it is in > http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/reference/oem/850.htm, which is the > OEM codepage used in Swedish windows. > > I'm having trouble seeing why '*' would have a different value in > different codepages. I'm wondering if we're going down the wrong road > completely here? Agreed. The idea that <=127 codes are different for different encodings (code pages) seems impossible. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [email protected] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org