Re: More Code Page wierdness
Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.win32 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Simon Riggs wrote: >On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 11:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > >>"Magnus Hagander" <[email protected]> writes: >> >> >>>I'm having trouble seeing why '*' would have a different value in >>>different codepages. I'm wondering if we're going down the wrong road >>>completely here? >>> >>> >>That was what was bothering me too. It's hard to interpret Simon's >>report in another way though. >> >> > >I'm open to other suggestions as to why "*" would not work, when other >explicit settings do.... > >...especially something that gets fixed by changing the code page. > >I do agree that its hard to see whats going on... I spent 4 hrs on a * > > Can you hex dump a file edited with various code pages in place and see what different values an asterisk gets? That should settle the question, shouldn't it? cheers andrew ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match