Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Does it help if you flip the order of the snprintf and vsnprintf
> >> functions in snprintf.c?
> 
> > Yes, it fixes the problem and I have applied the reordering with a
> > comment.
> 
> Fascinating.
> 
> > I will start working on fixing the large fmtpar allocations now.
> 
> Quite honestly, this code is not worth micro-optimizing because it
> is fundamentally broken.  See my other comments in this thread.

I am working on something that just counts the '%' characters in the
format string and allocates an array that size.

> Can we find a BSD-license implementation that follows the spec?

I would think NetBSD would be our best bet.  I will download it and take
a look.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [email protected]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match