Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32?

"Dave Page" <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:05:41 -0000

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.win32,gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general
Message-ID	<E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E472BBF1@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: 17 March 2005 04:20
> To: Magnus Hagander
> Cc: Tom Lane; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; Merlin Moncure
> Subject: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to 
> open_sync for Win32?
> 
> 1.  Should it be the default wal_sync_method for Win32?

Yes.

> 2.  Another question is what to do with 8.0.X?  Do we 
> backpatch this for
> Win32 performance?  Can we test it enough to know it will work well? 
> 8.0.2 is going to have a more rigorous testing cycle because of the
> buffer manager changes.

This question was asked earlier, and iirc, a few people said yes, and
no-one said no. I'm most definitely in the yes camp.

Regards, Dave.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend