Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:54:54 +0100, Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Landrum [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 29 March 2005 15:52
> > To: Dave Page; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] writing backend extensions
> > using Visual Studio
> >
> > Maybe a good solution to this is to add an extra option in the
> > installer's development category to include header files for backend
> > development?  That way most people (even those who do front-end
> > development) don't have to deal with having that whole include tree
> > installed, but those who want to do backend work can still get
> > everything required without doing their own build/source installation.
> 
> Yeah, that's quite straightforward to do - although, there are that many
> files that it would probably be easier to do a wildcard include anyway
> unless it's a fairly well defined set that's required. In reality I
> doubt most people would care whats in the include/ directory anyway -
> it's the download size I'm more worried about!

For what it's worth, if I zip up the $PGSRC/include directory, the
archive is about 500K.  That seems like a pretty minimal bump to the
17MB installer.

-greg

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [email protected] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly