Re: [HACKERS] Failures with windows port

I wrote:

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>>
>> Can someone confirm that the newer 1.10 MinGW doesn't need the psql
>> print.c newline hack?  If so, we can do a version test in that area and
>> mark it down as a mingw version-specific bug.
>>
>>  
>>
>
> I assume you mean MSys 1.0.10 - I have that plus MinGW 3.1.0-1 these 
> are the latest releases that are not "candidates"
>
> The fix seems needed on mine. Still investigating.
>

I have pretty much eliminated the possibility that some CVS nastiness 
with line endings could cause the problem - I tested with a checkout via 
a cvs that translates line endings, one that does not (cygwin's), and 
the nightly snapshot. All gave clean results with the fix in, dirty with 
it removed. Presumably it must be a function of either the OS or the 
MSys/MinGW setup.

My System:
  W2K
  5.00.2195
  SP4
  x86 Family 6 model 8
  MSys 1.0.10
  MinGW 3.1.0-1

Command used to test: "./configure --without-zlib; make check"

At this stage I have no clue as to what systems might/might not need the 
fix.

cheers

andrew





---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match