Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > I'm ruferring to NTFS and the win32 platforms.  How does tar handle
> these
> > symlinks on the NTFS filesystem?  What about if someone finds that
> FAT32
> > is significantly better for the database?
> 
> FAT32 is not a journaling filesystem and has no security features and is
> not suitable for databases, period.  Microsoft NT setup disks do not
> even allow FAT32 to be installed on disks over a certain size for the
> boot partition.  
> 
> PostgreSQL relies on standard features of the POSIX system, not on O/S
> attributes.  AFAIK, win32 is the only non POSIX API supported by the
> PosgreSQL developers.  If Microsoft's non POSIX compliance bothers you,
> install Interix, which provides POSIX for win32 (including symlinks).
> Or, use the linking option provided by the good folks who are doing the
> native port.

Symlinks have too many advantages on most platforms to use anything
else.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [email protected]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [email protected] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly