Re: using replace function

Hi Osvaldo, Rod, David and Tom

Thanks for your attention.  Lastly it is not that difficult.

For me the more natural way is Rod's suggestion, to use replace with where.
I don't know why I didn't think of this solution.

The usage of regexp_replace is very nice too and I will take a time to
learn it.

Thanks a lot to you all

Antonio

Em sex., 29 de nov. de 2019 às 01:22, Tom Lane <[email protected]> escreveu:

> "David G. Johnston" <[email protected]> writes:
> > On Thursday, November 28, 2019, Rob Sargent <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> I want to replace a string (not a substring) in a field but making sure
> >> that the string in the full field.
>
> > I’d probably do something like:
> > Select case when a.col = ‘value’ then ‘new value’ else a.col end from a;
>
> Yeah, this.  You could wrap it up in a SQL function if you want the
> same level of notational convenience as replace().
>
> Another possibility is regexp_replace with an anchored pattern, but
> that would potentially require escaping regexp metacharacters in the
> pattern, so the PITA factor is high.  And I doubt it'd be faster than
> the CASE solution.
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>


-- 
Antônio Olinto Ávila da Silva
Biólogo / Oceanógrafo
Instituto de Pesca (Fisheries Institute)
São Paulo, Brasil