Re: Slow planing...

Mladen Marinović <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.general
Message-ID <CAHjkqPSdki=eaNHZxiOOOd9iuHYnPdwbVa7_T2dGWO-6r3h+UA@mail.gmail.com>
After a couple of hours of trying different stuff, set enable_mergejoin  =
off made the planning time look better: Planning time: 0.322 ms
Any ideas why this helps?

Regards,
Mladen Marinović

On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 11:14 AM Mladen Marinović <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Since this morning our system is running slower than usual. It turns out
> that some queries take a very long time to plan ( > 1 second). The problem
> occurs when joining bigger tables. There are no partition for the used
> tables. The problem has a time correlation with the last
> autovacuum/autoanalyse this morning, but manual vacuuming and analysing did
> not fix the problem.
>
> An example explain is:
>
> EXPLAIN ANALYSE
> SELECT 1
> FROM table_a a
>   LEFT JOIN table_b bON b.a_id= a.id
> WHERE a.object_id=13
>   AND a.timestamp<'2019-12-06'
>   AND a.timestamp>'2019-12-03'
>
> Nested Loop Left Join  (cost=1.28..18137.57 rows=6913 width=4) (actual
> time=0.043..90.016 rows=14850 loops=1)
>   ->  Index Scan using uq_object_id_timestamp on table_a a
>  (cost=0.70..7038.49 rows=6913 width=8) (actual time=0.028..21.832
> rows=14850 loops=1)
>         Index Cond: ((object_id = 13) AND (timestamp <
> '2019-12-06'::timestamp with time zone) AND (timestamp >
> '2019-12-03'::timestamp with time zone))
>   ->  Index Only Scan using table_b_a_id on table_b b  (cost=0.57..1.60
> rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.004..0.004 rows=0 loops=14850)
>         Index Cond: (a_id = a.id)
>         Heap Fetches: 0
> Planning time: 1908.550 ms
> Execution time: 91.004 ms
>
> The same query on a similar parallel system takes 5ms for planing (PG
> 9.4.).
>
> Is there a way to detect why the planing is taking this long?
>
> The database is a 9.6.1 with 32GB of shared_buffers, and 1GB of
> maintanance_work_mem, and machine CPU is below 80% all the time.
>
> Regards,
> Mladen Marinović
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.