Re: UPDATE many records
Adrian Klaver <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:02:19 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/7/20 12:58 PM, Israel Brewster wrote: >> On Jan 7, 2020, at 11:56 AM, Alan Hodgson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 11:47 -0900, Israel Brewster wrote: >>> One potential issue I just thought of with this approach: disk space. >>> Will I be doubling the amount of space used while both tables exist? >>> If so, that would prevent this from working - I don’t have that much >>> space available at the moment. >> >> The original update you planned would do that, too. >> >> You probably need to just do the update in batches and vacuum the table >> between batches. >> >> > > Really? Why? With the update I am only changing data - I’m not adding any additional data, so the total size should stay the same, right? I’m obviously missing something… :-) https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-vacuum.html "VACUUM reclaims storage occupied by dead tuples. In normal PostgreSQL operation, tuples that are deleted or obsoleted by an update are not physically removed from their table; they remain present until a VACUUM is done. Therefore it's necessary to do VACUUM periodically, especially on frequently-updated tables." > > --- > Israel Brewster > Software Engineer > Alaska Volcano Observatory > Geophysical Institute - UAF > 2156 Koyukuk Drive > Fairbanks AK 99775-7320 > Work: 907-474-5172 > cell: 907-328-9145 > >> > > > -- Adrian Klaver [email protected]