Re: Upgrading databases
Greg Stark <[email protected]> Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:48:29 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.interfaces |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> wrote: > 3. Slony. Setup a slave database, get everything in sync, then switch over to the > new database. Very minimal downtime (seconds to minutes). Requires all tables > have primary keys. > > 4. Bucardo. Similar to the steps of Slony above. More forgiving of interruptions > in the original replication event. I've never done this process myself. I'm wondering how flexible Slony and Bucardo are with the versions of Postgres they support. Does the Slony version run on the new version have to match the Slony version on the old one? Do old versions of Slony work on new versions of Postgres? Or do you have to update the version of Slony on the old database before you can move to a new database version because the new database version requires a newer version of Slony? I'm even less familiar with Bucardo but have the same questions there too. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-interfaces mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-interfaces