Re: PGconn and fork

Rodrigo Barboza <[email protected]> Wed, 8 May 2013 11:06:48 -0300
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.interfaces
Message-ID <CANs8QJbYdhwVfVozntnKZUovqx69x0LtoQYFVNOtO9HTG0ZcvA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:

> Rodrigo Barboza <[email protected]> writes:
> > I have a program in C, the createas a connection, do stuff, fork, exit
> > child and continues life.
> > Supose that when I create de PGconn, I have 1 active connection in
> postgres.
> > When I fork, does it count as a second connection? I mean, will postrges
> > interpretate 2 active connections or they only share the same connection?
> > I know that if the child process execute some query, I can get unexpected
> > results, but it doesn't, so I am safe about that.
> > I'm only worried that this can increase the number of connections and
> reach
> > the limit of max_connections.
>
> No, the child process will just have another reference to the open
> socket that connects to the server.  The reason why it's dangerous
> to send queries from such a process is exactly that, to the server,
> it looks like the same connection as the parent process.
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>

Perfect.
Thanks, Tom!