Re: PGconn and fork
Rodrigo Barboza <[email protected]> Wed, 8 May 2013 11:06:48 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.interfaces |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANs8QJbYdhwVfVozntnKZUovqx69x0LtoQYFVNOtO9HTG0ZcvA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Rodrigo Barboza <[email protected]> writes: > > I have a program in C, the createas a connection, do stuff, fork, exit > > child and continues life. > > Supose that when I create de PGconn, I have 1 active connection in > postgres. > > When I fork, does it count as a second connection? I mean, will postrges > > interpretate 2 active connections or they only share the same connection? > > I know that if the child process execute some query, I can get unexpected > > results, but it doesn't, so I am safe about that. > > I'm only worried that this can increase the number of connections and > reach > > the limit of max_connections. > > No, the child process will just have another reference to the open > socket that connects to the server. The reason why it's dangerous > to send queries from such a process is exactly that, to the server, > it looks like the same connection as the parent process. > > regards, tom lane > Perfect. Thanks, Tom!