Re: Protocol Question
Tom Lane <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:06:19 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.interfaces |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thomas Heller <[email protected]> writes: > The first 16 bits (well skip the first 40) in every DataRow ('D') packet > refer to the number of columns following. Is there any way that this number > is different from the number received in the RowDescription ('T')? A quick look into libpq says that it doesn't support them being different: /* Get the field count and make sure it's what we expect */ if (pqGetInt(&tupnfields, 2, conn)) { /* We should not run out of data here, so complain */ errmsg = libpq_gettext("insufficient data in \"D\" message"); goto advance_and_error; } if (tupnfields != nfields) { errmsg = libpq_gettext("unexpected field count in \"D\" message"); goto advance_and_error; } > Currently I use an assert since I assume it always is the same, however I > only have tested with a very limited dataset so far. An assert seems overly optimistic. libpq has an explicit test with an error recovery path, you should too. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-interfaces mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-interfaces