Re: Temporarily very slow planning time after a big delete

Walter Smith <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.performance
Message-ID <CAOERZXg7zeHDUpVcfq2SUGYjEyZ-M6q6p3FJ8-5U+DUMHNNa9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:17 AM Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:16 AM Walter Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It occurs to me that is a somewhat unusual index -- it tracks
> unprocessed notifications so it gets an insert and delete for every row,
> and is normally almost empty.
>
> Is it a very low cardinality index? In other words, is the total
> number of distinct keys rather low? Not just at any given time, but
> over time?


Very low. Probably less than ten over all time. I suspect the only use of
the index is to rapidly find the processed=false rows, so the
notifiable_type value isn’t important, really. It would probably work just
as well on any other column.

— Walter
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.