Re: zabbix on postgresql - very slow delete of events

Maxim Boguk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.performance
Message-ID <CAK-MWwRYfkUgboJTWQvDn64LBeB4EarGZDe94ngbsUqmNnxdcQ@mail.gmail.com>
>
>
> All these queries execute well below 1 ms, using indexes.
>
>
>
> Let's delete one row. See explain results here:
> https://explain.depesz.com/s/aycf . 5 seconds to delete a single row,
> wow!
>
> This shows that it is the foreign key constraints on event_recovery and
> alerts that take a lot of time.
>
> But why? I far as I can see, the delete is fully CPU bound during
> execution.
>
>
>
> Deleting the corresponding row directly from event_recovery or alerts
> executes in less than 0.1 ms.
>
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
> I've observed that alerts and event_recovery tables both have more than
> one foreign key that references events, if that matters.
>
>
>
Hi Kristian,

After comparing structure of zabbix tables with same in my zabbix
installation I found one very weird difference.
Why type of events.eventid had been changed from default bigint to numeric?

I suspect that the difference between events.eventid (numeric) type
and event_recovery.*_eventid (bigint) types might lead to inability of use
index during foreign key checks.
Anyway it will be clearly visible on the pg_stat_xact_user_tables results
(I now expect to see 3 sequential scan on event_recovery and may be on some
other tables as well).

Kind Regards,
Maxim


-- 
Maxim Boguk
Senior Postgresql DBA
https://dataegret.com/

Phone RU: +7  985 433 0000
Phone UA: +380 99 143 0000
Phone AU: +61  45 218 5678

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/maksym-boguk/80/b99/b1b
Skype: maxim.boguk

"Доктор, вы мне советовали так не делать, но почему мне по-прежнему больно
когда я так делаю ещё раз?"
image8741bc.PNG (image/png, 5.1 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.