Re: Planner performance in partitions

Michael Lewis <[email protected]> Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:37:26 -0600

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.db.postgresql.performance
Message-ID	<CAHOFxGr3TG4OAHGvkXKhHbF-h2JaXR5+djDkA6o=MsquXkLAsQ@mail.gmail.com>

Was there a reason to exceed 100-500 partitions in real life that pushed
you to do this test? Is there some issue you see when using 100 partitions
that is solved or reduced in severity by increasing to 1200 or 6000
partitions?

lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.