Re: UPGRADE TO PG11 CAUSED DEGREDATION IN PERFORMANCE

Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.performance
Message-ID <CAFj8pRAuOjeGyuyamnDZoeJ-hTHtCwZ6t+Geo9Z4XjOnpG3EoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi

ne 18. 8. 2019 v 8:57 odesílatel Mariel Cherkassky <
[email protected]> napsal:

> Hey,
> I upgraded my pg9.6 cluster to pg11.2.
> As it seems after the upgrade the duration of the same flow in my
> application raised from 13 minutes to 19 minutes.
>
> The test I did :
> 1.reset pg_stat_statements
> 2.run the applicative flow
> 3.collect everything from pg_stat_statements
>
> I did this test on the env before the upgrade and after the upgrade. I
> took the sum of the total_time in pg_stat_statements and sumed it up.
>
>
first, did you run VACUUM ANALYZE after upgrade?

Regards

Pavel


> my env settings :
> 60GB RAM
> 16CPU
> regular HD
>
> postgresql.conf settings :
> max_wal_size = 2GB
> min_wal_size = 1GB
> wal_buffers = 16MB
> checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9
> checkpoint_timeout = 30min
> standard_conforming_strings = off
> max_locks_per_transaction = 5000
> max_connections = 500
> random_page_cost = 4
> deadlock_timeout = 5s
> shared_preload_libraries = 'pg_stat_statements'
> track_activity_query_size = 32764
> log_directory = 'pg_log'
> enable_partitionwise_join = on
> enable_partitionwise_aggregate = on
> max_worker_processes = 16               # (change requires restart)
> max_parallel_maintenance_workers = 8   # taken from max_parallel_workers
> max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 8    # taken from max_parallel_workers
> max_parallel_workers = 16
> maintenance_work_mem = 333MB
> work_mem = 60MB
> shared_buffers = 15129MB
> effective_cache_size = 30259MB
>
> The conf file was used in 9.6 (without all the new parallel settings).
> Now the same queries run in both tests because it was the same flow. I
> will be happy to hear if u have any ideas without involving any queries
> changes..
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.