Re: Slow query on a one-tuple table
Luís Roberto Weck <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Em 19/09/2019 15:34, Igor Neyman escreveu: > -----Original Message----- > From: Luís Roberto Weck [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 2:30 PM > To: Michael Lewis <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Slow query on a one-tuple table > > WARNING: This email originated from outside of Perceptron! Please be mindful of PHISHING and MALWARE risks. > > Em 19/09/2019 14:21, Michael Lewis escreveu: >> Is this result able to be repeated? > Yes, I can consistently repeat it. > > Postgres version is 11.1. > > Other executions: > > Index Scan using assessoria_pkey on public.assessoria (cost=0.25..2.47 > rows=1 width=62) (actual time=1.591..4.035 rows=1 loops=1) > Output: asscod, asscambol > Index Cond: (assessoria.asscod = 1) > Buffers: shared hit=1187 > Planning Time: 0.053 ms > Execution Time: 4.055 ms > > Index Scan using assessoria_pkey on public.assessoria (cost=0.25..2.47 > rows=1 width=62) (actual time=1.369..3.838 rows=1 loops=1) > Output: asscod, asscambol > Index Cond: (assessoria.asscod = 1) > Buffers: shared hit=1187 > Planning Time: 0.033 ms > Execution Time: 3.851 ms > > ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > But can you repeat it with "LIMIT 1"? > Notice huge difference in "buffers hit" while doing (the same) Index Scan in two plans. > > Regards, > Igor Neyman With LIMIT 1, I get 3 shared buffers hit, pretty much always.