Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time
Nicolas Charles <[email protected]> Mon, 16 Dec 2019 23:08:52 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Could it be that your CPUs is warming and throttling? You didn't mention t= he platform used, so I'm not sure whether it's a server or a laptop Nicolas Le 16 d=C3=A9cembre 2019 21:50:17 GMT+01:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss=2Epgh=2Epa= =2Eus> a =C3=A9crit : >Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt=2Eie> writes: >> Why do the first and the twentieth executions of the query have >almost >> identical "buffers shared/read" numbers? That seems odd=2E > >It's repeat execution of the same query, so that doesn't seem odd to >me=2E > >This last set of numbers suggests that there's some issue with the >parallel execution infrastructure in particular, though I don't see >what >it would be=2E Doesn't execParallel wait for the workers to exit before >the leader finishes its query? If so, how is there any persistent >state >that would interfere with a later query? > > regards, tom lane --=20 Envoy=C3=A9 de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail=2E Veuillez exc= user ma bri=C3=A8vet=C3=A9=2E