Re: Seeking reason behind performance gain in 12 with HashAggregate
Shira Bezalel <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:45:55 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAE0KEwEyMhS85CcUJyom6QQ4VtSn6bwxiz-VoBpRe4DWw-12CQ@mail.gmail.com> |
--000000000000a0d8d8059c0c685d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Thanks Tomas. I ran a vacuum full on the 9.6 table -- still no difference in the query plan. The shared buffers hit went up slightly to 36069. Shira On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:12 PM Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:44:14PM -0800, Shira Bezalel wrote: > >Hi Michael, > > > >I appreciate your question. I ran a vacuum analyze on the 9.6 table and it > >yielded no difference. Same number of buffers were read, same query plan. > > > > VACUUM ANALYZE won't shrink the table - the number of buffers will be > exactly the same. You need to do VACUUM FULL, but be careful as that > acquires exclusive lock on the table. > > > regards > > -- > Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services > -- Shira Bezalel Database Administrator & Desktop Support Manager San Francisco Estuary Institute www.sfei.org Ph: 510-746-7304 --000000000000a0d8d8059c0c685d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:tahoma,s= ans-serif">Thanks Tomas. I ran a vacuum full on the 9.6 table -- still no d= ifference in the query plan. The shared buffers hit went up slightly to 360= 69.=C2=A0=C2=A0</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:taho= ma,sans-serif"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:= tahoma,sans-serif">Shira</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir= =3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:12 PM Tomas Vondra = <<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">tomas= [email protected]</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_= quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,= 204);padding-left:1ex">On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:44:14PM -0800, Shira Beza= lel wrote:<br> >Hi Michael,<br> ><br> >I appreciate your question. I ran a vacuum analyze on the 9.6 table and= it<br> >yielded no difference. Same number of buffers were read, same query pla= n.<br> ><br> <br> VACUUM ANALYZE won't shrink the table - the number of buffers will be<b= r> exactly the same. You need to do VACUUM FULL, but be careful as that<br> acquires exclusive lock on the table.<br> <br> <br> regards<br> <br> -- <br> Tomas Vondra=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = <a href=3D"http://www.2ndQuadrant.com" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank"= >http://www.2ndQuadrant.com</a><br> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services <= br> </blockquote></div><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr"= ><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><fo= nt color=3D"#666666" face=3D"tahoma, sans-serif" size=3D"2">Shira Bezalel= =C2=A0</font></div><div><font color=3D"#666666" face=3D"tahoma, sans-serif"= size=3D"2">Database Administrator & Desktop Support=C2=A0</font><span = style=3D"color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:sma= ll">Manager</span></div><div><font color=3D"#666666" face=3D"tahoma, sans-s= erif" size=3D"2">San Francisco Estuary Institute</font></div><div><font col= or=3D"#666666" face=3D"tahoma, sans-serif" size=3D"2"><a href=3D"http://www= .sfei.org" target=3D"_blank">www.sfei.org</a></font></div><div><font color= =3D"#666666" face=3D"tahoma, sans-serif" size=3D"2">Ph: 510-746-7304</font>= </div></div><div style=3D"font-weight:bold;font-style:normal;font-variant:n= ormal;line-height:20px;margin:0px"><br style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0);font-famil= y:Tahoma;font-size:13px;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal"></div> <div style=3D"padding-top:8px"> =C2=A0</div></div></div></div></div></div></div> --000000000000a0d8d8059c0c685d--