Re: Retrieving result of COUNT(*) with PHP

Mihail Mihailov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.php
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

actually, I don't think you need pg_fetch_all.
I use pg_fetch_row for the purpose. What you get with the SELECT  
clause is one row.

E.g. like this:
$res = pg_fetch_row(pg_query("SELECT COUNT(*) AS result_count FROM  
etc. WHERE etc.")); //Not a very good style :-), one should check if  
the query runs
$count = $res[0];

Another way to calculate number of rows in the result is to use  
pg_num_rows function.
$res = pg_query("SELECT COUNT(*) AS result_count FROM etc. WHERE etc.");
$count = pg_num_rows($res);

Enjoy!

Mihail



Quoting Lynna Landstreet <[email protected]>:

> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to use a SELECT COUNT(*) to count how many results would be
> retrieved from a particular query (as part of the process of paginating
> search results).
>
> But I'm having trouble figuring out how to retrieve the result of the count
> in PHP. The result on its own is a resource rather than a specific value,
> but when I try to retrieve the result via pg_fetch_result, some kind of
> weird math error happens and I get a huge number that bears no resemblance
> to the number of results the query actually gets when it runs (1,714,608 for
> a query that in actuality produces three results).
>
> I tried using an AS clause (SELECT COUNT(*) AS result_count FROM etc. WHERE
> etc.) to give the result a name, but that didn't help, and when I tried
> using pg_fetch_all on the result to see exactly what it was retrieving, I
> got this:
>
> Array
>     (
>         [0] => Array
>            (
>             [result_count] => 1714608
>           )
>
>     )
>
> Again with the weird number. And yet, if I run the exact same query in the
> SQL window of phpPgAdmin, I get the proper result count (3 in this
> instance).
>
> Does anyone know what's going on here? Can I just not use SELECT COUNT(*)
> with PHP at all?
>
> I originally had the script running the actual query and then counting the
> results, and then running it again with LIMIT and OFFSET to get one page's
> worth of results, but it seemed wasteful to do it that way, so I was trying
> to do it more efficiently... :-/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lynna
>
> --
> Spider Silk Design - http://www.spidersilk.net
> 509 St Clair W Box 73576, Toronto ON Canada M6C 1C0
> Tel 416.651.2899 - Toll Free 1.866.651.2899 - Cell 416.873.9289
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.