Re: [HACKERS] Darwin compile fixes
Tom Lane <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.help,gmane.comp.db.postgresql.ports,gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > Attached is a cleaned up version of the patch (without wrapping). The > change is to use "$(CXX) $(CFLAGS)" instead of $(COMPILER). Does this > change break OS/X? Since our configure doesn't define CXX, I'm having a hard time imagining how it could fail to break it. If we *did* define CXX, it would presumably point to g++, which would also break things since our source code is not C++ clean. Even more to the point, Darwin isn't broken now --- at least it works fine on the powerbook I'm typing this on, and on the several OSX machines in the buildfarm. I would like to know what this patch is alleged to fix before even considering applying it. regards, tom lane