Re: Rekall for Mandrake

On Saturday 17 Jan 2004 11:00 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Spencer wrote:
> > >What if the prefix lib was removed, would that help. If so I suppose
> > > we could make appropriate changes to the "lib locator" module
> >
> > I doubt that would help because it's the .so extension that it's
> > screaming about, not the lib name.
>
> The rpmlint checker would be pretty broken if it tried to put every *.so
> file into a devel package.  What about other software that features
> dynamically loadable modules?

Yes, I'm confused here as well. Why does rpmlint think the likes of 
libkbase_componentview.so should be in a development package?

>
> _______________________________________________
> Rekall-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mailman.a-i-s.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rekall-devel

-- 
Regards
Mike

http://www.rekallrevealed.org
*THE* GPL/Open Source database front end for Linux and Windows.