Re: rrdcache Update success response..
Steve Shipway <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.rrdtool.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <28E447343A85354483BCF7C3E9D5EAA5149A849D@uxcn10-1.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> |
This is not actually a complete success message, a complete success doesnt have the 'errors,' prefix. The initial '0' is the status code -- 0 for "OK,no more lines follow". The 'errors, enqueued' message is a 'partial success' message; possibly it thinks you sent two values and only one was correctly enqueued (check for multiple or trailing spaces in the command you sent which could be taken as a badly-formatted value) Steve Steve Shipway University of Auckland ITS UNIX Systems Design Lead [email protected] Ph: +64 9 373 7599 ext 86487 ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Shaun Reitan [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 2 November 2010 7:36 a.m. To: [email protected] Subject: [rrd-developers] rrdcache Update success response.. On a successful update you get the following response. 0 errors, enqueued 1 value(s). The problem i see with this response is that if you carve up the response using perl (or any other language) using a whitespace as a delimiter you will end up with the following... status = 0 message = errors, enqueued 1 value(s). The problem i see here with this response is that the message indicates there was errors even though i think what it's really trying to say was 0 errors. The response should probably really say 0 0 errors, enqueued 1 value(s). OR 0 no errors, enqueued 1 value(s). maybe this is a bug? -- Shaun Retian Chief Technical Officer Network Data Center Host, Inc. http://www.ndchost.com _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers