Re: regarding rrdcached

Steve Shipway <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.rrdtool.devel
Message-ID <7294716191A1E142B80615ED2C633BCAF2D737@uxcn10-2.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
Anything that decreases data corruption must be a good thing

Though probably the error messages would need to be standardised before it gets into production:

+        RRDD_LOG (LOG_ERR, "handle_request_update: "
+            "YO DAWG, I HER ... something went wrong (%s)",
+            ci->file);
...
+        RRDD_LOG (LOG_ERR, "handle_request_update: "
+            "YO DAWG, I HERD U LIEK DISCARDING DATA (%s)",
+            ci->file);

Should the second case produce an 'err' message, though?  Since no data will actually be lost, maybe this should be a LOG_INFO or LOG_WARN instead?

Steve

Steve Shipway
ITS Unix Services Design Lead
University of Auckland, New Zealand
Floor 1, 58 Symonds Street, Auckland
Phone: +64 (0)9 3737599 ext 86487
DDI: +64 (0)9 924 6487
Mobile: +64 (0)21 753 189
Email: [email protected]
 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

_______________________________________________
rrd-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.8 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.