Re: regarding rrdcached
Steve Shipway <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.rrdtool.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7294716191A1E142B80615ED2C633BCAF2D737@uxcn10-2.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> |
Anything that decreases data corruption must be a good thing Though probably the error messages would need to be standardised before it gets into production: + RRDD_LOG (LOG_ERR, "handle_request_update: " + "YO DAWG, I HER ... something went wrong (%s)", + ci->file); ... + RRDD_LOG (LOG_ERR, "handle_request_update: " + "YO DAWG, I HERD U LIEK DISCARDING DATA (%s)", + ci->file); Should the second case produce an 'err' message, though? Since no data will actually be lost, maybe this should be a LOG_INFO or LOG_WARN instead? Steve Steve Shipway ITS Unix Services Design Lead University of Auckland, New Zealand Floor 1, 58 Symonds Street, Auckland Phone: +64 (0)9 3737599 ext 86487 DDI: +64 (0)9 924 6487 Mobile: +64 (0)21 753 189 Email: [email protected] Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.8 KB) - not displayed