Re: RRD Graph Data
"Alex van den Bogaerdt" <[email protected]> Thu, 9 Jun 2016 16:17:56 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.rrdtool.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7f3ca6b4c1bcc05ea1546c984a78f7c0.squirrel@webmail.argewebhosting.nl> |
> Hmmm Alex, got it. you're responding to Simon's reply. Just to make that clear. > RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:1:600 > RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:6:700 > RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:24:775 > RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:288:797 > RRA:MAX:0.5:1:600 > RRA:MAX:0.5:6:700 > RRA:MAX:0.5:24:775 > RRA:MAX:0.5:444:797 > > > and my datasources are: > > DS:in:COUNTER:600:U:U > DS:out:COUNTER:600:U:U default step size of 300 seconds? If RRDtool does what it promises, you could set the end time to some time n*300s, and set the start time to "end-300s". That should give you one stores rate out of the RRA with each CDP is 1 PDP. Simon wrote: >> What I'm trying to say is that the graph may be showing the average for >> the previous 5 minute period, while fetch is showing you the average for >> the previous 30 minutes. don't know how accurate RRDtool is nowadays but there was a time when start and/or end times were "massaged" to some other number than one would expect. When discussed as such, the response was more "don't care" than "will fix", and that's when I lost my passion. Different versions had (have?) different problems, so whoever is trying similar things should be prepared to closely look what *exactly* is happening, as opposed to how it *should* behave (read: is documented).