Re: New word to replace "serverless"

I'd stick with "serverless".  The marketing teams that make "serverless"
mean that websites don't run with "servers" are I-D-TEN-Ts.  It's a fad
phrase that'll go away eventually.  I understand marketing, and its
purpose, but, in this case, they're pushing it.


On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 9:31 PM sub sk79 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Also maybe Slipstreamed?
>
> -Neal
>
> On Monday, January 27, 2020, sub sk79 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > How about Seamless, Integrated or Baked-in?
> >
> > -Neal
> >
> > On Monday, January 27, 2020, Warren Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Jan 27, 2020, at 3:18 PM, Richard Hipp <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > "serverless" has become a popular buzz-word that
> >> > means "managed by my hosting provider rather than by me.”
> >>
> >> “Serverless” it a screwy buzzword anyway, because of course there’s
> still
> >> a server under its new meaning.
> >>
> >> My vote?  Keep using the term.  We were here first.
> >>
> >> This is an ancient problem.  It is why is any serious dictionary the
> >> count of definitions considerably exceeds the count of headwords.  These
> >> new kids?  “serverless, sense 2.”
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> sqlite-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users