Re: New word to replace "serverless"
Karl Billeter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.sqlite.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20200128041746.sfkzytzyf7w77k4m@redgum> |
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 05:18:45PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > For many years I have described SQLite as being "serverless", as a way > to distinguish it from the more traditional client/server design of > RDBMSes. "Serverless" seemed like the natural term to use, as it ... > So what do I call this, if I can no longer use the word "serverless" > without confusing people? > > "no-server"? > "sans-server"? > "stackless"? > "non-client/server"? I feel "non-client/server" gets to the core of it, but is slightly negative in context - "well, here's what I'm not..". Also a little unwieldy. Regards, Karl _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users