Re: Please increase the default for SQLITE_MAX_VARIABLE_NUMBER

If the trouble comes from a big "IN()", an approach can be to pass all the
values in a JSON array (one parameter) and use json_each in the query.
This is completely safe vs SQL injection, and IME quite efficient.

IME using JSON + json_each is also very efficient to fill temporary tables
(indexed if appropriate), in case the filter is reused in multiple queries.

Le mar. 11 févr. 2020 à 20:39, J. King <[email protected]> a écrit :

> On February 11, 2020 1:43:30 p.m. EST, Jens Alfke <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >I ran into this a few months ago. I ended up just biting the bullet and
> >constructing a SQL statement by hand, concatenating comma-separated
> >values inside an "IN (…)" expression.
> >
> >Yes, SQL injection is a danger. But if you're being bad in just one
> >place, and you review that code, you can do this safely. SQLite's C API
> >even has a function that escapes strings for you, and if you're not
> >coding in C/C++, it's easy to write your own; basically
> >       str ⟶ "'" + str.replace("'", "''") + "'"
>
>
> Same here, for what it's worth. Since SQLite also has a 1M byte statement
> length limit I had my application embed terms once an IN() expression
> exceeded a certain number of terms, but used parameters always for string
> terms longer than a couple hundred bytes.
> --
> J. King
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users