Re: Is it possible to dump a sqlite db that has an associated -wal file?
Stefan Brüns <[email protected]> Sun, 16 Feb 2020 21:02:12 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.sqlite.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <17978923.mU7WlXy8lX@pebbles> |
On Sonntag, 16. Februar 2020 18:36:15 CET Simon Slavin wrote: > On 16 Feb 2020, at 5:15pm, Peng Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why the database can not be read by another sqlite3 session when the > > corresponding -wal file exists? Thanks. > > This is done on purpose by the developers of Firefox to prevent a security > vulnerability which I will not describe in public. Will this stop anyone from just copying the DB without the -wal file? Afterwards, the DB can be read, as there is no longer any associated log. > One of the Mozilla developers involved in the decision reads this list. If > you have a good reason why you want to open the SQLite database while > Firefox is running, you could post it here. You might be able to persuade > them to reconsider the decision. One use case I am aware of (although this targets places.sqlite, not cookies.sqlite) is reading the history, bookmarks and tags. Kind regards, Stefan -- Stefan Brüns / Bergstraße 21 / 52062 Aachen home: +49 241 53809034 mobile: +49 151 50412019 _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQSwWRWIpJbl0W4DemNvf0o9jP6qUwUCXkmfxAAKCRBvf0o9jP6q U5iHAJwMP7Ku4YTDZLoMORK28vQV6BxTqQCeKceYJVHwjI7iUHvlPMy130LGmD4= =YBxa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----