Re: Question about max size of a dbrpcparam
"Navdeep Shergill" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the info James! On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:23 AM, James K. Lowden <[email protected]>wrote: > Navdeep Shergill wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Navdeep Shergill > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > well.. i set it to 4096 and it worked!!! > > > > > > I am amazed. :) > > > > > > Now the question is what else will this impact?? Meaning changing the > > > block size like this..> > > > > Can someone comment on the blocksize parameter in the freetds.conf > > > flag? is it safe to change it? > > > > Can someone comment on the blocksize parameter in the freetds.conf flag? > > is it safe to change it? > > It's safe. I don't understand why larger blocks work and smaller ones > don't, and ISTR that we automatically set the blocksize to 4096 on TDS7+ > connections. But I'm glad it works for you. You might have tripped on a > subtle TCP implementation bug. > > --jkl > _______________________________________________ > FreeTDS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds >