Re: rowcount not available? [NC]
"Mittel, Alexander" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5EA97F57AE4E9D4BBC7879FEF671C0DA535589380B@DEFTHW99E15MSX.ww902.siemens.net> |
Hi, this is a FreeTDS-mailing list, not a SQLServer-forum :-) But: "set rowcount nn" is something completly different then "@@ROWCOUNT". "set rowcount 10" limits the number of returned rows when doing a SELECT. If a table has 20 rows then only 10 rows will be returned. "@@ROWCOUNT" is set by SQLServer and contains the number of affected rows, i.e. with UPDATE Maybe look at MS doc to see Mfg Alexander -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Cedric ROUVRAIS Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. August 2009 21:33 An: FreeTDS Development Group Betreff: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC] Hi, Me again, anybody have any clues? When I execute select @@ROWCOUNT I get the correct count that is to say. Why would the rowcount not be available ? a++ Cedric __________________ Hi guys, I have come across an interesting behaviour with SQL Server 2008, when you use the instruction: "set rowcount nn" such as "set rowcount 10" then DBCOUNT(dbproc) returns -1. Anyone have any ideas??? Thanks, Cedric