Re: BCP In of data too large fails [NC]
Konrad J Hambrick <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds |
|---|---|
| Organization | PayPlus Software, Inc |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Cedric ROUVRAIS wrote: > [email protected] wrote on 08/24/2009 06:16:33 PM: > >> We are using either freebcp or MS BCP.EXE to automatically >> upload tens-of-GB of data every night on each of 20+ systems >> and my vote is for freebcp to work EXACTLY like MS BCP.EXE. > > I have ensured that FreeTDS freebcp and bsqldb works exactly as Sybase > bcp/isql and have fixed bugs in the process because my vote is for freebcp > to work EXACTLY like Sybase BCP.EXE. > > You have a perspective, I have a perspective. Who is right? The one with > the most developpers and systems? I think you will loose there ;o) > > So, for the next release the question of whether or not someone wants to > look at the changes/fixes remains in the air. The fixes aren't related only > to the column size issue of freebcp.c as bsqldb.c/bcp.c/dblib.c have been > changed to for other reasons. > > a++ Cedric Cedric -- Question ... After you have gotten 'as many apps as possible off Sybase ASAP' will you not want to EXACTLY emulate MS BCP.EXE behaviour ? How about a compromise ? Export an environment Varb (say, EMULATE_SYBASE) or an optional command line flag to override the default MS BCP.EXE behavior ? That way the Sybase behavior could be optionally invoked as necessary. -- kjh