Re: [Bug Report] Missing Winsock initialization in v0.82
Paul Thurston <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2A93B3F6EB39EA48A0D41234D272A82A5F5029D376@EXVMBX020-11.exch020.serverdata.net> |
Damien: I agree with you. If we set-up, say, CMake, it would be analogous to the gmake set-up on Unix. With enough CMake switches, users could easily configure their favorite build flavor. Paul From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Damien Churchill Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 7:30 AM To: FreeTDS Development Group Subject: Re: [freetds] [Bug Report] Missing Winsock initialization in v0.82 On 13 May 2010 12:11, Paul Thurston <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Frediano: > > I don't think it's important to worry about other Windows IDEs besides Visual Studio. > > There are two reasons for my thinking on this: > > 1. Visual Studio is the standard IDE for Windows Development > > 2. Alternative IDEs (Borland, MingW, etc) usually contain utility tools to port from a VS project. > > Maintaining project files for the two most recent versions of Visual Studio seems like more than enough support. > This should allow folks to easily customize the 'standard' FreeTDS configuration to one of their own liking. > > Let's ask Damien for his opinion on this one. > > Best, > > Paul > I personally think that putting a standard cross platform system in place would be more useful. Whenever there is duplication there is always the risk that things will go out of sync! However if this is a bit too out of scope then merely maintaining a VS project would suffice. I would prefer to do the former and am willing to give my time to do so. _______________________________________________ FreeTDS mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds