Re: Kerberos delegation question, and Solaris 10 x86 problems in unittests

2010/9/16 Peter C. Norton <[email protected]>

> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:17:10PM -0400, James K. Lowden wrote:
> > Peter C. Norton wrote:
> > >
> > > I've hacked in some simple support for this with very minor edits to
> > > gssapi.c, tds.h, and config.c.  The support adds a new config option
> > > to freetds.conf that adds a boolean config option of "enable gssapi
> > > delegation = <true|false>" by adding a couple of defines in tds.h and
> an
> > > additional value to the TDSCONNECTION struct.
> > >
> > > So my first question is: Would this minor addition be accepted into
> > > the mainline freetds by the maintainers?
> >
> > Hello Peter,
> >
> > Absolutely.  I don't understand the fine points of Kerberos, but I don't
> > see any downside to the changes you propose.
>
> OK, I've attached the patch.
>
>
Applied. It works wiht updated flags. Personally I would prefer a shorter
option like "gssapi delegation" instead of "enable gssapi delegation" (just
paranoia!).

Regards
  Frediano