Re: a better libtds
Frediano Ziglio <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHt6W4d+eODOwRdyw3K4aEGQZr_ZD1dcpFQtg8gAuGzxZ7NcsQ@mail.gmail.com> |
News? I have a CVS repository mirror and I'm able to do a conversion. The only option I would discuss is -A option to cvsimport (I used it with success). CVS repository use unix usernames for user while git use e-mail. -A option allow you to specify unix username -> e-mail conversion, currently I have $ cat ~/cpp/freetds/cvs_author freddy77=Frediano Ziglio <[email protected]> jklowden=JK Lowden <[email protected]> my repository is currently at https://gitorious.org/freetds but I would prefer GitHub too for official repository (more stable and more features). Do we have already a GitHub account? If you like I can convert again entire project and branches and push to a new GitHub project. Regards Frediano 2011/8/23 Brian Bruns <[email protected]>: > Been using github for a coupla years, rock solid and the pull requests > will make a maintainers life quite easy. There was a big learning > curve with git itself, but that's another story. > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:45 PM, James K. Lowden <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> this big work would go much easier if we were all >>> on git. Anybody ready to make that a reality? >> >> I'm ready. It might be a little while before automatic patching and >> nightly snapshots are available. If there's a real emergency, we can >> still use CVS for patches to 0.91, otherwise even a month's delay of >> snapshots right after a release won't cause anyone great pain, >> especially because we're disturbing the code quite a bit. >> >> Have we agreed on a git hub? >> >> Regards, >> >> --jkl > _______________________________________________ > FreeTDS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds > _______________________________________________ FreeTDS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds