Re: FreeTDS 0.9.1 problem build on Solaris 10x86
"James K. Lowden" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:41:25 -0400 Todd Szymanski <[email protected]> wrote: > Just wanted to pass along that I was unable to successfully do a 'make > install' on 0.9.1. It seems like it worked, but it doesn't when you > go to use it. It looks like the install-sh that is included in the > distribution does not handle multiple files on one command line (I've > only tried it on Solaris). Your experience isn't typical, to say the least. I wonder: does Solaris have an install(1) on the PATH? $ file $(which install) /usr/bin/install: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64 .... It seems you *did* find a bug, albeit one masked on machines with a built-in install utility. The FreeTDS distribution tarball includes an install script, but configuration.ac -- from which the configure script is generated by autoconf -- does not reference it as AC_PROG_INSTALL. I would think configure, finding no built-in install utility and having not been directed to use another, would simply fail. Apparently, it uses the one it finds in the current working directory, if extant. And fails silently. :-/ I'm inclined to simply remove install-sh from the FreeTDS distribution. In 2011, machines without an install utility must be very rare, and a message like "sh: install: command not found" would be better than pretending to work. That leaves it to the sysadmin to provide an install utility. The alternatives I don't like as well. If we force configure to use a shell script, installation speed suffers. If we don't, but include a shell script as a last resort, it will be used infrequently, and likely not work when called upon. --jkl