Re: dbsetlversion + DBVERSION_100
Ken Collins <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Very interesting. I filed this ticket <https://github.com/rails-sqlserver/tiny_tds/issues/62> on my Ruby's TinyTDS page so I can look into our single use of dbsetlversion() vs dbsetversion() which does support DBVERSION_100 now. I myself have never considered which is more appropriate or tested if I should do both. - Ken On Nov 10, 2011, at 7:54 AM, LacaK wrote: > Hi, > can you please add into dblib.c support for Sybase 10 and above in dbsetlversion() > See attached diff. > TIA > -Laco. > --- dblib.c.ori Thu Aug 18 02:54:40 2011 > +++ dblib.c Thu Nov 10 13:45:56 2011 > @@ -936,6 +936,9 @@ dbsetlversion (LOGINREC * login, BYTE ve > case DBVER60: > login->tds_login->tds_version = 0x700; > return SUCCEED; > + case DBVERSION_100: > + tds_set_version(login->tds_login, 5, 0); > + return SUCCEED; > case DBVERSION_71: > tds_set_version(login->tds_login, 7, 1); > return SUCCEED; > _______________________________________________ > FreeTDS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds