Re: [unixODBC][Driver Manager]Function sequence error (SQL-HY010)

"Bower, Wayne (Wayne)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thank you for the fast response.  We will download and verify tomorrow.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Frediano Ziglio
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 5:37 PM
To: FreeTDS Development Group
Subject: Re: [freetds] [unixODBC][Driver Manager]Function sequence error (SQL-HY010)

Another fix is to download the latest patched version.... tomorrow,
just committed :)

Added a test too. Patch at
http://gitorious.org/freetds/freetds/commit/75525262a814c78d8a546d2f558895cad9938f2b

Frediano

2012/3/3 Bower, Wayne (Wayne) <[email protected]>:
> The problem appears to be restricted only to procedures with output parameters.  We have not encountered the problem with any procedure that only has input parameters.
>
> We can only avoid the problem by either not using 'SET NOCOUNT ON' or moving 'SET NOCOUNT ON' to a later point in the procedure.  This is demonstrated by the different examples in the test case.  Also note that having output parameters and 'SET NOCOUNT ON' as the first statement does not guarantee failure as shown with the example that begins with print "\nCreate $proc with input, output, select, init SET NOCOUNT\n";
>
> Please let me know if you need more information.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James K. Lowden
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 3:16 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [freetds] [unixODBC][Driver Manager]Function sequence error (SQL-HY010)
>
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 16:43:39 -0500
> "Bower, Wayne (Wayne)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Essentially the issue appears to be related to using 'SET NOCOUNT ON'
>> in a stored procedure. The script creates a procedure and executes
>> it.  The cases that fail issue the message '[unixODBC][Driver Manager]
>> Function sequence error (SQL-HY010)'.  To avoid the failure I have to
>> either remove 'SET NOCOUNT ON' or move later in the procedure.  Keep
>> in mind that this is just a test case to reveal the issue.  In our
>> actual code we always start each procedure with 'SET NOCOUNT ON' and
>> do much more than shown in this test case.
>
> Is the problem restricted to procedures that pass parameters?  If not,
> does bsqldb exhibit the same symptoms?  If so, could you provide just
> the SQL?
>
> If parameters are required to provoke the problem, I would alter
> src/odbc/unittests/rpc.c to induce it.  It tried the attached patch;
> it did not alter the outcome of the test.
>
> HTH.
>
> --jkl
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
_______________________________________________
FreeTDS mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
_______________________________________________
FreeTDS mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.