Re: RE : tds_socketpair on windows

Il 02 aprile 2012 04:01, James K. Lowden <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 17:15:27 +0100
> Frediano Ziglio <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > Is that true, Frediano?  Are we done with CVS?
>>
>> Yes,
>>   I moved some file, so no cvs.
>> Don't you update all scripts??
>
> I am *testing* new scripts, yes.  :-)
>
> The git tarballs are not working correctly yet.  I don't understand my
> local tree:
>
> $ pwd
> /var/releng/freetds/master
>
> $ git describe --tags
> branch-0_91-296-gf7a348f
>
> $ git branch
> * master
>
> $ cat freetds-dev.0.92.296.tar.gz.md5 # wrong name
> MD5 (freetds-dev.0.92.296.tar.gz) = 6ef2d3abc0af304fb24c62ea0efaa29f
> branch-0_91-296-gf7a348f        # right sha1 afaik
>
> $ head ChangeLog # 0.91 :-(
> Sun Mar 11 15:52:14 GMT 2012    Frediano Ziglio <freddy77_A_gmail_D_com>
>        * include/tds.h src/apps/tsql.c src/ctlib/ct.c
> src/dblib/dblib.c:
>        * src/odbc/odbc.c src/pool/member.c src/pool/user.c:
>        * src/server/login.c src/tds/config.c src/tds/mem.c:
>        * src/tds/unittests/common.c win32/winsetup.c:
>        - get rid of old tds_alloc_connection
>
> I have two working directories: Branch-0_91 and master.  The "master"
> directory seems to have switched to Branch-0_91 somehow.
>

currently branches follow cvs rules. git describe return first tag it
founds starting from current branch. master does not have a
"Branch-0_92" tag cause was not branched, it's just a continue. In
this case it found Branch-0_91 tag cause tag was on his way.
I use gitk to graphically see the history.

> Each night, my scripts do:
>
>        git clean
>        git pull
>
> How to ensure each one is pulling the right branch?
>

Should pull all branches.

Frediano
_______________________________________________
FreeTDS mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds