I would tend to agree. I haven't tried it yet with MS SQL Server but it works fine with Sybase in memory tables as FreeTDS doesn't know and doesn't need to know the difference. As far as I can see it's the same story with proxy tables, for example.
Cheers,
Matthew.
June 16 2015 1:38 PM, "Ray Rankins" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm curious as to why it wouldn't work to query an in-memory table.
> I don't have an environment available at the moment to test it out, but you run queries against an
> in-memory table just like a regular table using standard SQL statements (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE,
> DELETE).
> What goes on behind the scenes to manage an in-memory table structure should be transparent to the
> client application.
>
> -Ray
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: FreeTDS [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> Frediano Ziglio
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 3:55 AM
>> To: FreeTDS Development Group
>> Subject: Re: [freetds] FreeTDS and SQL 2014 In-Memory tables
>>
>> Il 16/Giu/2015 00:43, "Alistair Roberts" <[email protected]>
>> ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Has anyone tried FreeTDS and SQL 2014's in memory table option?
>>>
>>> Like to know if it's possible to get it to work or not.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Al
>>>
>>
>> Still not supported. Obviously it's possible to get it to work. The point
>> is how quick you want and the involvement you want. As said is not
>> implemented so it has to be implemented.
>>
>> Frediano
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeTDS mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.