Re: ODBC.ini parameter in FreeTDS

Sebastien FLAESCH <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds
Organization Four J's Development Tools
Message-ID <[email protected]>
James K. Lowden wrote:
> Rajesh Akolu wrote:
>> We are using FreeTDS 0.64 (TDS version 8.0) and unixODBC 2.2.12 on RH
>> Linux 3.4.6 and connecting to Microsoft SQL Server 2000 from Linux. 
> ...
>> We are looking for parameters which can increase the performance
> 
> You're looking for magic pixie dust to "increase performance" while
> providing no evidence for the notion that performance can be increased. 
> You seem to assume it can be, but why?  In a database application,
> bottlenecks don't show up in the network layer until the server and client
> are running at top speed.  
> 
> You can't manage what you don't measure.  Instead of asking the Internet
> for random tuning suggestions, monitor your application and discover where
> the delays are.  Then address yourself to those areas.  You'll have the
> satisfaction of learning something and doing the job right.  And,
> possibly, of increasing performance.  
> 
> --jkl
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds

Rajesh,

With the native MDAC and SNAC drivers of SQL Server, we got very good
performance improvements by using array fetch (SQL_ATTR_ROW_ARRAY_SIZE).

I am not quite sure if using array fetch makes a difference with FreeTDS,
but so far we use it as it was really efficient with the native drivers.

Note that we are not using the default cursor: we use server-side cursors.

Cheers,
Seb
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.