Re: cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?

"James K. Lowden" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Reid, Roger L. wrote:
> 
> I modified include/cspublic.h so that sqsh-2.1.5 would compile with
> 0.82.   In March,
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/freetds/2008q1/023098.html dealt with
> about the same issue  (except not including Sybase 15) by putting the
> defines in the sqsh code instead.
> 
> I have only tested this on Solaris 8.  
> 
> ----------- diff -e cspublic.h.orig cspublic.h -----------------
> 449c
> #define BLK_VERSION_110 BLK_VERSION_100
> #define BLK_VERSION_110 BLK_VERSION_100
> #define BLK_VERSION_120 BLK_VERSION_100
> #define BLK_VERSION_125 CS_VERSION_125
> #define BLK_VERSION_150 CS_VERSION_150

Harrumph!  I applied a patch from Richard Brown to the 0.82 branch in CVS
on 19 May 2008.  I don't know why I didn't apply it to HEAD, too.  Sorry
about that, Chief.  

I applied the same patch to CVS HEAD just now.  At least we can put that
issue to bed.  

Thanks for the tickle.  

--jkl
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.