Re: cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?
"James K. Lowden" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Reid, Roger L. wrote: > > I modified include/cspublic.h so that sqsh-2.1.5 would compile with > 0.82. In March, > http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/freetds/2008q1/023098.html dealt with > about the same issue (except not including Sybase 15) by putting the > defines in the sqsh code instead. > > I have only tested this on Solaris 8. > > ----------- diff -e cspublic.h.orig cspublic.h ----------------- > 449c > #define BLK_VERSION_110 BLK_VERSION_100 > #define BLK_VERSION_110 BLK_VERSION_100 > #define BLK_VERSION_120 BLK_VERSION_100 > #define BLK_VERSION_125 CS_VERSION_125 > #define BLK_VERSION_150 CS_VERSION_150 Harrumph! I applied a patch from Richard Brown to the 0.82 branch in CVS on 19 May 2008. I don't know why I didn't apply it to HEAD, too. Sorry about that, Chief. I applied the same patch to CVS HEAD just now. At least we can put that issue to bed. Thanks for the tickle. --jkl