Re: [U2] Reporting Tools
"Rutherford, Marc" <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Mar 2014 20:59:19 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.u2.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jeff, I would second Rodney Baakkonen's suggestion of writing out your delimited data to a Unix directory and ftp the blob to wherever the user would like to find it. This vastly expands the possible size limitations you would next hit at the Unix level. Of course if the existing reports consists of a lot of complex dictionaries then you would have a programming task you may not want. Endless alternatives spring to mind for that. Is performance an issue? Marc Rutherford Principal Programmer/Analyst Advanced Bionics LLC 661 362-1754 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of jeffrey Butera Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 12:34 PM To: U2 Users List; [email protected] Subject: Re: [U2] Reporting Tools On 3/3/14, 3:21 PM, Jeff Schasny wrote: > Jeff, > > What I think many of us are suggesting is essentially "if it hurts > when you do that, don't do that" i.e. if the query language won't > accomplish what you want to do, use something else. Jeff Believe me - I hear you (and others). But my administration isn't listening because they all think this is a reasonable request ("excel can handle 200+ columns"). So if I can't make this work in Unidata I'll have to move to MSSQL which I really, really, really don't want to do. At this point I'm just trying to understand the limit on the number of fields in a LIST statement. I know in my case that it's not a sentence length issue as I might've thought earlier so I'd like to know what is causing this (with the understanding that I very well may not be able to solve this). Jeff > > jeffrey Butera wrote: >> On 3/3/14, 2:58 PM, Brian Leach wrote: >>> Jeff >>> >>> Try mvQuery, that should not have any problems with those volumes. >> >> Hi Brian >> >> We've isolated the problem to Unidata itself, not the reporting tool. >> In short, when we do a LIST with about 150 fields, it throws: >> >> "too many items in LIST" >> >> As soon as we erase a field (any field), the LIST statement runs >> properly. Unfortunately, I cannot locate any parameter that might >> control this. I thought we were hitting U_SENTLEN - but we're >> nowhere near that value. >> >> >> > -- Jeffrey Butera, PhD Associate Director for Application and Web Services Information Technology Hampshire College 413-559-5556 _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users