Re: Dynamic vs static linkage
Igor Korot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.unixodbc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <14297063.1219289026584.JavaMail.root@elwamui-rubis.atl.sa.earthlink.net> |
Nick,
I just looked at the source. The call failing at the line 191 according to the log:
if ( environment -> requested_version == 0 )
What am I missing?
Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
>From: Igor Korot <[email protected]>
>Sent: Aug 20, 2008 8:06 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: [email protected]
>Subject: Dynamic vs static linkage
>
>Hi, (Nick),
>Is there a difference between running unixODBC in dynamic (.so) vs static (.a) library?
>
>I tried following code:
>
>RETCODE ret;
>SQLWCHAR driverDesc[1024];
>ret = SQLDriwers( m_henv, SQL_FETCH_FIRST, driverDesc, sizeof( driverDesc ) -1, 0, 0, 0, 0 );
>if( ret != SQL_SUCCESS )
>// generate error message
>else
>// call the same function with SQL_FETCH_NEXT
>
>When I call this code inside .so, it runs and executes fine, however, when I do this in .a library
>it returns HY090.
>
>I'm working with KDevelop and whatever it generated for my project.
>
>Thank you.
_______________________________________________
unixODBC-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.easysoft.com/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev