Re: odbctest

Nick Gorham <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.unixodbc.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Peter Harvey wrote:

>Nick,
>
>Looks like a lot of work went into odbctest but is it fully baked? I
>look at tools.cpp and the samples (ie quiktest.c) and it appears to be
>inconsistent in terms of the interface. The odbctest port to pure qt4
>went very well until I hit this final bit and now I find myself changing
>a lot of the code and even wondering if tools.cpp should be rewritten.
>
>--
>Peter
>
>_______________________________________________
>unixODBC-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.unixodbc.org/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev
>  
>
If I remember, I tried to match the MS interface, it is a bit odd, and I 
wonder is its ever been used.

What part are you finding inconsistent?

I will take a look and remind myself of that part.

As you say, the original work was in the main part, not the automated 
test part.

-- 
Nick
_______________________________________________
unixODBC-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.unixodbc.org/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.