Re: unixODBC-CPP

"Peter Harvey" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.unixodbc.devel
Message-ID <000101c978f3$d4160a10$7c421e30$@org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:unixodbc-dev-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Gorham
> Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 9:42 AM
> To: Development issues and topics for unixODBC
> Subject: Re: [unixODBC-dev] unixODBC-CPP
> 
> Peter Harvey wrote:
> 
> >>Just hack the code in DriverManager/SQLDriverConnect.c to null the
> >>handle before calling the driver, what we have done here doesn't need
> >>any more (or less) code in the driver to deal with prompts, that bit
> >>is entirly up to the driver.
> >>
> >>I don't think we can ever assume that apps are going to pass a valid
> >>handle into the call though. (with reference to your other email to
> >>the sqllite chap).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >Well the driver is going to have to do something platform specific to
> >fully handle SQLDriverConnect. I suppose one approach would be to
> always
> >pass a NULL window handle to the driver but that would either result
> in
> >an IM008 at times or the driver would have to do something platform
> >specific to prompt. My thinking is pass the ODBCINSTWND to the driver
> >and let the platform specific approach have a bit more information to
> >work with.
> >
> >--
> >Peter
> >
> >
> >
> Well, what I have done in the past with Easysoft drivers (though we
> don't bother now as no app ever makes use of it) is to ignore the
> window
> handle and just try and bring a Qt session up, no need for any special
> information from anywhere, My point is how would a application create a
> ODBCINSTWND even if it wanted to?
> 
> Given that Qt is going to be released under the LGPL now there is even
> less reason why a driver writer could not do the same as we did. It
> needs no platform specific code at all, just creating a QApplicaion and
> passing control to it. In just the same way as the odbcinstQ code does.
> 

Yes; I agree that your solution does work but would it be slightly better
(with no real down-side) to pass in an ODBCINSTWND? Advantages (however
slight) are;

- greater chance of the dialog being properly parented
- greater chance that the dialog will look & feel the same as the parent

The driver can then decide to use the approach the developer feels is best;
 
IF ( WIN )
   - ignore hwnd OR
   - assume HWND is MS window handle
ELSE
   - ignore hwnd OR
   - assume HWND is ref to an ODBCINSTWND

--
Peter


_______________________________________________
unixODBC-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.unixodbc.org/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.