Re: unixODBC (as per cvs) and current source for sqlite odbc
Peter Lai <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.unixodbc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The only issue with transitioning is no more individual file version tracking. I don't think this will prove a problem to you, just making sure you know the consequences. Also merging back to CVS during the migration requires some munging (FreeBSD has a pretty good understanding of how this works). I'm all for SVN, Just giving you a heads up. On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Nick Gorham<[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Harvey wrote: >> >>> I need to do some work on the CVS status, 2.2.15pre is not back in CVS at >>> the moment. There will be a lot of changes, mainly relating to removing the >>> bits that are now in their own projects now. I was musing changing to SVN at >>> this point. What do people think? >>> >>> >> >> SVN with a proper tree structure (trunk, releases, etc) would be great. >> Getting rid of the 'cruft' is a great bonus. > > Gets my vote to, any objections? > > -- > Nick > _______________________________________________ > unixODBC-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.unixodbc.org/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev > _______________________________________________ unixODBC-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.unixodbc.org/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev