Re: Unicode support

Another question Nick. I was up on the unixodbc website, and for the 2.0.9 release , it says the following was fixed:
- Add build time option to select wchar_t UNICODE (4 bytes) as opposed to signed short UNICODE (2 byte)

I believe we build unixODBC ourselves. Does this mean that I could actually build unixODBC on unix boxes for the different sizes of wchar_t on unix v/s windows? And this would require no code changes on my part? And I could use wchar_t's the way it is being used now?

Please clarify.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Gorham
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 4:03 PM
To: Development issues and topics for unixODBC
Subject: Re: [unixODBC-dev] Unicode support

SHANKAR Uma wrote:
> Thanks Nick for the quick response. I did not realize that about
> wchar_t's. Since I am not a regular unix developer, I have a couple of
> further questions.
>  Are there other constructs that I could use for wide-chars conversions
> that would be more portable between both windows and unix? I will try
> out iconv like you suggest as well.
>   
#include <sqlucode.h>

SQLWCHAR str[ 100 ];

-- 
Nick
_______________________________________________
unixODBC-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.unixodbc.org/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev
_______________________________________________
unixODBC-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.unixodbc.org/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev