Re: unixodbc gui split
Peter Lai <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Jan 2016 22:32:08 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.unixodbc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACPAC332gQ+DGmH9kvc5HLghUhndySQbw7+qC9oFUA_kS4Drcg@mail.gmail.com> |
This is the UNIX principle of KISS (keep it simple stupid). In a server environment, having the GUI part is neither necessary nor desirable. Core codebase provides the core functionality. As long as the API is documented and the hooks are present/maintained, the GUI code should be kept separate. This helps with development process workflow: why result in extra version bumps of UnixODBC every time some code in the GUI got changed? Why reduce portability/stability just to keep add-on code? I suppose an argument could be made to use Make flags to tell it whether to build the GUI or not. On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Igor Korot <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Nick, > Sorry to write on the private email. I just don't know which unixODBC > mailing list is still good... > > Have a quick question: what was the reasoning behind the GUI part split? > I am running Gentoo and trying to compile the unixODBC GUI part it > gives an error. > > It is very helpful to have the GUI part put back and ship it as one project. > > Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > unixODBC-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.unixodbc.org/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev _______________________________________________ unixODBC-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.unixodbc.org/mailman/listinfo/unixodbc-dev